Dear Senator:
I was very displeased to learn of your vote against gun background checks
last week. I have not always agreed with you over the years but I have always
respected your integrity. I do not
expect my elected officials to respond to polls, per se, but when 90% of the
nation supports background checks, I
do believe that you should seriously consider the moral implications of
betraying the will of the people.
Perhaps a story will help to clarify my views. Just after
graduating college, I tutored high school kids in East New York, in
Brooklyn. One fine spring day, I took
the train out to meet one of my charges.
A block away from the library, I noticed a crowd of people and police. At
the center of attention was my tutee, lying dead on the sidewalk.
We never learned why a 16 year old boy splattered most of
her brain matter over a couple of parked cars. We did learn that the weapon was
purchased at a gun show in Virginia, as part of a huge bulk buy, and was
transported north for sale on the streets of New York for a tidy profit. The
gun runner in question had committed a string of violent crimes, from Maine to
Georgia, and had spent most of his adult life in and out of prison.
Thou Shalt
Not Kill is a precept we should take seriously. Checking the background of
an adult before they are allowed to buy a piece of steel finely honed to snuff out a human life seems a reasonable thing to do. It will not bring my tutee back to her family. Your predecessors in
Congress failed on that account, but it just might give another budding
scholar a better lease on life.
I posted about background checks on a blog yesterday, and within
hours the comment thread was besieged by “trolls,” including one commenter who
said:
“Gun grabbers are the reason that 100 million Americans have
300 million guns and billions of rounds of ammo. Keep it up, trample our rights
and we’ll stockpile even more. We know how to use it and unfortunate accidents happen.”
A second commenter quipped: " The only way you are going to get the gun control you want [background checks] is by civil war."
A second commenter quipped: " The only way you are going to get the gun control you want [background checks] is by civil war."
These were just two of a half dozen sinister missives my post provoked. All these comments were posted anonymously; the
brazenness of the NRA member stops short at taking adult responsibility
for owning their words in a public forum. I seriously doubt Thomas
Jefferson would call these gentlemen fine upstanding defenders of freedom, would you? The Second
Amendment was written to protect the right of a nation to defend itself
against a tyrannical King, by men of gravity who took a rather dim view
of "unfortunate accidents."
You have spoken eloquently over your career about American
family values and the Judeo-Christian heritage. How do these individuals'
comments stack up?
Not to put too fine a gloss on it, I am puzzled as to why
you feel the need to hop in the political sack with such anti-Christian filth.
It is shameful, and it is a betrayal of the trust voters placed in you.
Hate and boorishness are not family values, and stockpiling
“ammo” does not make us free. When we feel the need to leave the house with a
loaded gun, we have already lost our freedom, our human dignity, and our
religion, just as I have irretrievably lost my faith in you.
#####
You can receive notices about new posts on the Data Driven Beltway on Twitter @MichaelAgosta1
#####
You can receive notices about new posts on the Data Driven Beltway on Twitter @MichaelAgosta1
Huzzah! Bravo. Yes, Michael.
ReplyDeletewhere's the dang like button on here? grumble grumble these newfangled deelibobs - who can figure them out?
DeleteLIKE
God bless you and your wily blog ways! Well said!
ReplyDeleteHugs! Josina